INDI
indie Semiconductor, Inc. (INDI)
Last Price$2.8(8.0%)
Market Cap$535.7B
LTM EPS
($0.58)
EPS growth
(58.2%)
Ben Graham Fair Value
$53.7
Undervalued (Ben Graham formula)
1,840.1%
Stock quality
6/10
Good

INDI Ben Graham Fair Value

Ben Graham Fair Value
Ben Graham Revised Fair Value

Ben Graham Fair Value Assumptions

as of Mar 10, 2025
EPS
($0.58)
P/E Base for no-growth company
8.5x
EPS growth
(58.2%)
Average Yield of AAA Corporate Bonds
4.4%
Current Yield of AAA Corporate Bonds
5.1%
Last share price
$2.8
Ben Graham Fair Value (local)
$53.7
Ben Graham Fair Value
$53.7
1840.1% undervalued

Ben Graham Fair Value Calculation

EPS
($0.58)
x
(
P/E base for no-growth
8.5x
+
2
x
EPS growth
(58.2%)
)
x
Average AAA
Bond Yield
4.4%
/
Current AAA Bond Yield
5.1%
=
Ben Graham Fair Value
$53.7

Best stock ideas on the market right now

With Value Sense, you can find undervalued stocks list with intrinsic value. Discover more stock market investment ideas.

INDI EPS growth & Dividend Yield

Annual
Quarterly
LTM
Industry Median
5Y Historical Average
Benchmark

INDI vs Peer Set: Ben Graham Fair Value Comparison

Explore more intrinsic value tools hub for INDI

FAQ

What is indie Semiconductor, Inc.'s fair value according to the Ben Graham formula?

As of Dec 31, 2024, indie Semiconductor, Inc.'s fair value using the Ben Graham formula is $53.7 per share. This is calculated using Ben Graham formula, where EPS is ($0.6) and BVPS (Book Value Per Share) is $2.5. The current price of $2.8 suggests indie Semiconductor, Inc. may be overvalued by this conservative metric.

What is indie Semiconductor, Inc. earnings per share (EPS)?

indie Semiconductor, Inc. earnings per share (EPS) for the twelve months ending Dec 31, 2024, was ($0.6), a (58.2%) growth year-over-year.

What is indie Semiconductor, Inc.'s margin of safety based on the Ben Graham analysis?

indie Semiconductor, Inc.'s margin of safety is positive 1,840.1%, calculated as (Graham Number - Current Price) / Current Price. A negative margin of safety suggests the stock doesn't provide the level of safety Graham typically sought in his investments.