Last Price$35.91.1%
Market Cap$9,517.2M
LTM FCF to Net Income
142.7%
5Y avg
14.8%
Specialty Business Services industry
median
106.4%
Stock quality & Intrinsic value
5/10
0.2% undervalued
Aramark FCF to Net Income
Annual
Quarterly
LTM
Industry median
Company stand-alone
Crunching data... Almost there!
| Sep'11 | Sep'12 | Sep'13 | Oct'14 | Oct'15 | Sep'16 | Sep'17 | Sep'18 | Sep'19 | Oct'20 | Oct'21 | Sep'22 | Sep'23 | Sep'24 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCF to Net Income | (179.2%) | 180.9% | 399.3% | (79.3%) | 75.0% | 111.3% | 138.9% | 75.5% | 111.3% | 40.7% | (305.5%) | 169.8% | 45.3% | 277.4% |
Overvalued or undervalued?
Check the intrinsic value for ARMK
and see if it's the right time to invest.
Aramark (ARMK) FCF to Net Income comparison analysis
General
LTM FCF to Net Income
OTHER METRICS
Company name
Revenue growth
EPS growth
Net Income margin
AramarkARMK
142.7%
(7.7%)
(61.4%)
1.5%
Median Peer Set
135.9%
8.4%
30.3%
6.5%
CBIZ, Inc.CBZ
269.9%
14.0%
(67.8%)
2.3%
RB Global, Inc.RBA
208.3%
16.4%
114.3%
9.6%
ABM Industries IncorporatedABM
179.4%
3.2%
(66.1%)
1.0%
Global Payments Inc.GPN
176.4%
4.7%
63.5%
15.5%
Rentokil Initial plcRTO
144.4%
45.5%
25.6%
7.1%
UniFirst CorporationUNF
127.4%
8.7%
35.0%
6.0%
Cintas CorporationCTAS
108.5%
8.9%
16.7%
16.4%
Maximus, Inc.MMS
98.9%
8.2%
89.8%
5.8%
Thomson Reuters CorporationTRI
85.0%
2.5%
49.0%
39.7%
First Advantage CorporationFA
(14.8%)
(5.7%)
(39.5%)
4.9%
ARMK key stats
USD
Millions
Billions
Annual
Quarterly
Trailing
Key stats
Income statement
Balance sheet
Cash Flow Statement
Valuation
Ratios
Per share
Per employee
Dividends & Yields
| Sep'11 | Sep'12 | Sep'13 | Oct'14 | Oct'15 | Sep'16 | Sep'17 | Sep'18 | Sep'19 | Oct'20 | Oct'21 | Sep'22 | Sep'23 | Sep'24 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
% growth | 13,082.4 0.0% | 13,505.4 3.2% | 13,945.7 3.3% | 14,832.9 6.4% | 14,329.1 (3.4%) | 14,415.8 0.6% | 14,604.4 1.3% | 15,789.6 8.1% | 16,227.3 2.8% | 12,829.6 (20.9%) | 12,096.0 (5.7%) | 16,326.6 35.0% | 18,853.9 15.5% | 17,400.7 (7.7%) |
| Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) | 11,836.8 | 12,191.4 | 12,661.1 | 13,363.9 | 12,880.4 | 12,890.4 | 12,989.0 | 13,990.2 | 14,532.7 | 11,993.7 | 11,007.1 | 14,767.6 | 17,037.8 | 15,975.0 |
% margin | 1,245.6 9.5% | 1,314.0 9.7% | 1,284.5 9.2% | 1,469.0 9.9% | 1,448.7 10.1% | 1,525.4 10.6% | 1,615.4 11.1% | 1,799.4 11.4% | 1,694.7 10.4% | 835.9 6.5% | 1,088.9 9.0% | 1,559.1 9.5% | 1,816.1 9.6% | 1,425.7 8.2% |
| Operating Expenses | 698.5 | 732.2 | 770.0 | 904.4 | 820.8 | 779.1 | 807.4 | 973.3 | 959.8 | 902.2 | 897.4 | 930.7 | 2,223.6 | 719.2 |
| Research & Development Expenses (R&D) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Selling, General & Administrative Expenses (SG&A) | 188.0 | 203.0 | 227.9 | 382.9 | 316.7 | 283.3 | 299.2 | 377.1 | 367.3 | 307.0 | 346.7 | 398.4 | 1,560.5 | 283.6 |
% margin | 547.1 4.2% | 581.8 4.3% | 514.5 3.7% | 564.6 3.8% | 627.9 4.4% | 746.3 5.2% | 808.1 5.5% | 826.1 5.2% | 891.2 5.5% | (66.3) (0.5%) | 191.4 1.6% | 628.4 3.8% | 862.9 4.6% | 706.5 4.1% |
| Interest Income | 18.7 | 5.5 | 6.4 | 4.3 | 4.9 | 5.3 | 5.9 | 9.2 | 29.0 | 15.0 | 15.3 | 17.6 | 30.2 | 0.0 |
| Interest Expense | 466.1 | 459.1 | 425.6 | 334.9 | 285.9 | 315.4 | 287.4 | 354.3 | 335.0 | 382.8 | 401.4 | 381.5 | 441.3 | 366.7 |
| Pre-tax Income | 96.0 | 125.0 | 90.6 | 229.7 | 342.0 | 430.9 | 520.6 | 471.9 | 556.2 | (647.7) | (132.9) | 255.6 | 851.1 | 364.9 |
% effective tax rate | (0.7) (0.8%) | 18.1 14.5% | 19.2 21.2% | 80.2 34.9% | 105.0 30.7% | 142.7 33.1% | 146.5 28.1% | (96.6) (20.5%) | 107.7 19.4% | (186.3) 28.8% | (40.6) 30.6% | 61.5 24.0% | 177.6 20.9% | 103.0 28.2% |
% margin | 83.8 0.6% | 103.6 0.8% | 69.4 0.5% | 149.0 1.0% | 235.9 1.6% | 287.8 2.0% | 373.9 2.6% | 567.9 3.6% | 448.5 2.8% | (461.4) (3.6%) | (92.2) (0.8%) | 194.5 1.2% | 674.1 3.6% | 262.5 1.5% |
| EPS | 0.36 | 0.45 | 0.30 | 0.66 | 0.99 | 1.19 | 1.53 | 2.31 | 1.82 | (1.83) | (0.36) | 0.76 | 2.59 | 1.00 |
| Diluted EPS | 0.36 | 0.45 | 0.30 | 0.63 | 0.96 | 1.16 | 1.49 | 2.24 | 1.78 | (1.83) | (0.36) | 0.75 | 2.57 | 0.99 |
% margin | 1,078.4 8.2% | 1,042.4 7.7% | 1,035.6 7.4% | 1,098.9 7.4% | 1,121.6 7.8% | 1,213.4 8.4% | 1,306.5 8.9% | 1,414.5 9.0% | 1,348.4 8.3% | 310.7 2.4% | 580.7 4.8% | 1,164.0 7.1% | 1,526.1 8.1% | 1,167.8 6.7% |
Discover more Stock Ideas
Undervalued stocks right now
Discover the top 20 best undervalued stocks to buy for Mar 2025, listed on the Nasdaq or NYSE.
3M Return 32.1%
S&P Outperformance 19.1%
Next 3M Predicted Return 20.3%
Undervalued growth stocks
Discover the top 20 best undervalued large-cap growth stocks to buy for Mar 2025, listed on the Nasdaq or NYSE.
3M Return 35.3%
S&P Outperformance 22.3%
Next 3M Predicted Return 26.8%
Undervalued dividend stocks
Discover the top 20 best undervalued high-yield dividend stock that offers both growth potential and attractive dividend returns for Mar 2025.
3M Return 28.4%
S&P Outperformance 15.4%
Next 3M Predicted Return 16.9%
FAQ
1) What is Aramark's FCF to Net Income?
As of today, Microsoft Corp's last 12-month FCF to Net Income is 142.7%, based on the financial report for Dec 27, 2024 (Q4’2024). The average annual FCF to Net Income for Aramark have been 0.8% over the past three years, and 15.5% over the past five years.
2) Is Aramark's FCF to Net Income Good?
As of today, Aramark's FCF to Net Income is 142.7%, which is higher than industry median of 106.4%. It indicates that Aramark's FCF to Net Income is Good.