NAPA
The Duckhorn Portfolio, Inc. (NAPA)
Last Price$11.10.0%
Market Cap$1,631.7M
LTM EPS
$0.43
EPS growth
41.4%
Ben Graham Fair Value
$33.5
Undervalued (Ben Graham formula)
201.8%
Stock quality
6/10
Good

NAPA Ben Graham Fair Value

Ben Graham Fair Value
Ben Graham Revised Fair Value

Ben Graham Fair Value Assumptions

as of Mar 10, 2025
EPS
$0.43
P/E Base for no-growth company
8.5x
EPS growth
41.4%
Average Yield of AAA Corporate Bonds
4.4%
Current Yield of AAA Corporate Bonds
5.1%
Last share price
$11.1
Ben Graham Fair Value (local)
$33.5
Ben Graham Fair Value
$33.5
201.8% undervalued

Ben Graham Fair Value Calculation

EPS
$0.43
x
(
P/E base for no-growth
8.5x
+
2
x
EPS growth
41.4%
)
x
Average AAA
Bond Yield
4.4%
/
Current AAA Bond Yield
5.1%
=
Ben Graham Fair Value
$33.5

Best stock ideas on the market right now

With Value Sense, you can find undervalued stocks list with intrinsic value. Discover more stock market investment ideas.

NAPA EPS growth & Dividend Yield

Annual
Quarterly
LTM
Industry Median
5Y Historical Average
Benchmark

NAPA vs Peer Set: Ben Graham Fair Value Comparison

Explore more intrinsic value tools hub for NAPA

FAQ

What is The Duckhorn Portfolio, Inc.'s fair value according to the Ben Graham formula?

As of Oct 31, 2024, The Duckhorn Portfolio, Inc.'s fair value using the Ben Graham formula is $33.5 per share. This is calculated using Ben Graham formula, where EPS is $0.4 and BVPS (Book Value Per Share) is $9.8. The current price of $11.1 suggests The Duckhorn Portfolio, Inc. may be overvalued by this conservative metric.

What is The Duckhorn Portfolio, Inc. earnings per share (EPS)?

The Duckhorn Portfolio, Inc. earnings per share (EPS) for the twelve months ending Oct 31, 2024, was $0.4, a 41.4% growth year-over-year.

What is The Duckhorn Portfolio, Inc.'s margin of safety based on the Ben Graham analysis?

The Duckhorn Portfolio, Inc.'s margin of safety is positive 201.8%, calculated as (Graham Number - Current Price) / Current Price. A negative margin of safety suggests the stock doesn't provide the level of safety Graham typically sought in his investments.